ON TRYING TO KEEP STILL
J E N N Y D I S K I
First published in Great Britain in April 2006 by Little, Brown
Copyright © Jenny Diski 2006
Night-room
We’re here because we like to keep things simple.
We like to think of nothing but ourselves.
This place is here for us.
This place is ours.
The nurses are all ours.
The drugs are ours.
All we have to do is do nothing.
All we have to do is ache with joy.
From ‘Lou-Lou’ by Selima Hill, 2004
Recently I retired to my estates, determined to devote myself as
far as I could to spending what little life I have left quietly and
privately; it seemed to me then that the greatest favour I could
do
for my mind was to leave it in total idleness, caring for itself,
concerned
only with itself, calmly thinking of itself. I hoped it could
do that more easily from then on, since with the passage of time
it had grown mature and put on weight.
But I find . . . that on the contrary it bolted off like a runaway
horse, taking far more trouble over itself than it ever did over
anyone else; it gives birth to so many chimeras and fantastic monstrosities,
one after another, without order or fitness, that, so as to
contemplate at my ease their oddness and their strangeness, I
began to keep a record of them, hoping in time to make my mind
ashamed of itself.
From ‘On Idleness’ (I:8)
The Essays by Michel de Montaigne, 1580
I N T R O D U C T I O N
Something about the idea of being a travel writer distresses me.
So this is not a travel book, though it contains some journeys. It
is a book on travelling and keeping still. Primarily, it is about
the
wish to keep still. Something about the distinction between being
a fiction and a non-fiction writer distresses me, too. So I think
of
myself as a writer. Period. I suppose that curiosity, the need to
know, is at the heart of it – at the heart of us. Writers (and
others)
might qualify as that dreadful child frozen in time who repeatedly
asks ‘why’ in response to every answer to every previous
question.
That’s curiosity, but it’s also the good sense a child
has that she is
being lied to. Mostly the answers to her questions are wrong, or
at least insufficient, sometimes because of ignorance, sometimes
laziness, but often because the question was impossible to answer.
The problem about not knowing is that the question which is
supposed to elicit enlightenment is difficult to frame precisely,
because you don’t know. Perhaps the point of asking questions
is
not to receive an answer but to reiterate and refine the question
itself. I’m inclined to think that there is, essentially, only
one
question. It is ‘What is the point?’ and in some form
or another
it is asked over and over again by those of us who have failed to
mature enough to stop asking it.
Another question is: what is it like when something or nothing
happens? Something or nothing happens all the time. The same
question has been asked – more or less consciously, with more
or
less precision – by many others; let’s say just about
everyone, but
notably for me by Michel de Montaigne in his Essais, along with
Daniel Defoe in Robinson Crusoe, St. Augustine in The Confessions,
Nietzsche in his Notebooks.
In 2000 I made a millennial move from London (where I was
born, brought up and always lived) to Cambridge, for no other
reason than that someone I loved – the Poet – lived there.
Not
quite travelling, not quite keeping still. But it can’t be
said that
now I am alone most of the time. It troubles me no end – I
worry
about it while delighting in the company I chose, and choose. In
the past year I have spent periods alone – in various ways,
but
usually deliberately – in New Zealand, in a farm cottage in
Somerset, in Lapland. You are never alone with a mind, of
course. I am, therefore I think – remember, wonder, obsess.
You’re
never alone with a world. No man is an island – if only. The
past
and the present state of the world and of my regular life press in,
no matter how I would wish my private space impenetrable.
Levi-Strauss declared of totemic systems that animals are good to
think with. Irritants and interruptions are also, much as I dislike
them, good to think with. Anyway they are there, in and outside
my head – memories, inconsequentialities, and the doings of
the
world.
Much worse, more alarming than anything else, there is also in
solitude emptiness: a mind devoid of thoughts, or rushing away
from them, which is more shocking than outside interruption. No
peaceful blankness, but a mad, skittering nothingness. The perfect
image of aloneness collapses into trivia and pointlessness.
Boredom, perhaps, but I don’t think so. It is more like a flat
refusal to think. A compulsion to subvert the circumstances I
have provided myself with. Not stillness, but a fretful pacing in
my cage. This may be an altogether more authentic will to oblivion.
A sorry truth that shines a light on my narcissistic notion of
blankness and turns it inside out. Take travelling and keeping
still, fiction and non-fiction with a pinch of salt.
PART ONE
ON DISTANCE
If I am not at home, I am always very near it.
Montaigne: Of Repentance
ON BEING VERY FAR AWAY
I may be the last person left alive who is still amazed each time
I
arrive in another country. In most other ways I have adjusted to
modernity – I write on a computer, send and receive emails,
even
carry a mobile phone when I am out (if I remember it) – but
I
have never shaken off a sense of wonder each time I set foot in a
foreign land. My sense of the extraordinariness of being in
another country was strong when I travelled as a small child, by
boat or plane with my parents to Belgium and Italy. We lived in
London, mostly in our part of London. Knowing I lived on an
island was central to my thinking about my geographical place in
the world. Other parts of my island, south London or anywhere
else in Britain, were simply places belonging to where I lived but
which I didn’t inhabit. But once I was crossing the defining
boundary of the English Channel I felt like a space traveller setting
off for a distant planet. A trip on a plane to Brussels or
Alassio matched the folk-and-fairy-tale journeys I read of
princesses, fishermen, woodcutters and youngest sons, travelling
mysteriously in the dead of night to other lands, magical flights
on carpets or winged horses, quests for their hearts’ desire
to
impossible elsewherenesses.
It is my experience that the oddest of existences becomes
normal, regular, ordinary, if that is what you are living, and yet
the strangeness of getting to somewhere else, to another country
(pace Scotland, Wales), has never gone away. I remember how I
felt about those foreign journeys as a small child so clearly
because I feel just the same now. I cannot get used to foreign
travel. It has nothing immediately to do with difference in language
or customs, but simply with arriving somewhere that is
designated quite else. Somewhere talked of, seen on a map.
Somewhere not here, where theoretically I always have been and
am. A place that must be crossed over to. Over the border. It
isn’t that some places are more exotic than others. Amsterdam
and the moon are equally other to me, and if I ever go to the
moon, it will be quite as exciting as each time I arrive in
Amsterdam.
Conversely, although it takes as long to fly to Manchester
as it does to Paris, at Orly airport I am somewhere else, whereas
when
I set down on the runway in Manchester I am just in a place
where I happen not to have lived. The distance in miles from one
place to another has nothing to do with distance. It is more like
that usefully untranslatable word Freud made so much of:
unheimlich. Unhomelike, literally. Uncanny, as it is generally
translated. For me, it is strangerness and a most particular vastly
lost sensation that I can’t help but define as homesickness.
I know for a fact that you don’t have to have a home you want
to be in to be homesick. I was at home during my four-month
stay in the Lady Chichester Psychiatric Hospital in Hove at the
age of fifteen; I was not at home in the children’s home I
was
sent to four years earlier at eleven, when my mother and I were
evicted from our flat. I was never at home when I lived alone
with my mother (at times living with her was the very definition
of unheimlich), but I was homesick when I was taken from living
alone with her to the children’s home somewhere on the coast,
with its hospital-like dormitory of beds so tall I had to climb to
get into mine. The first night, I tried to make my getaway after
dark when everyone was asleep, but I was stopped by the
matron who saw me sidle past her door. She sat me in front of
the fire in her room, gave me cocoa and biscuits and asked me
where I was going. ‘Home’ I said, which was nowhere just
then,
so I meant ‘my mother’, who was nothing like as warm
and
comforting as the kindly matron. I expect my mother loved me,
but she needed me more, and vented her fears and grief on me.
She terrified me sometimes and, worse, was always on the verge
of terrifying me, but in the cosy chair of the matron’s sitting
room, where she gently asked me to explain my problem, all I
wanted was to be back where I had been, where I should be,
where I had always been, even though I was where I was now
because the school truant officer had found me in an empty flat
from which all the furniture, even the carpets, had been repossessed,
my mother shrieking, me lying on the floorboards
crying. When my father left, months before, he gave me the
option, suitcase in hand, of going with him. I opted to stay with
my mother, though he was the one I felt most comfortable with
in all the world. The parent I loved. But I knew neither of them
were trustworthy, and I must have believed that mere love
would not prevent homesickness, so I chose my mother as the
place where my home was. Simple inertia, perhaps.
Homesickness is a longing for inertia – for never having moved
in the first place. Which, unless I had a choice before conception,
would make my mother the very emblem of home,
however she and I got on. She was at least as close to the original
inertia as I could get. And Freud, of course, places the
source of the unheimlich in the maternal womb.
Forty-five years on, I am not at home at King’s Cross Station
at eleven p.m. taking the late train back to Cambridge. Even if I
am with the Poet, with whom I am at home and almost live with,
I am not at home waiting for (or on) the train. I am not at home
when I am not at home but, strangely, I like to be in transit.
To
be in transit is a very particular condition: on the train to
Cambridge is not in transit, it is just not yet home. On the train
with no particular destination around America is fine; I’m
not on
my way, trying to get home from somewhere, not there yet. I
cried once (not so very long ago when I was still living in
London) outside Liverpool Street Station. It was eleven-thirty at
night. I couldn’t find a taxi to take me home to Kentish Town
after I had been to Norwich to give a reading. Suddenly, looking
up and down the empty road, the distance between Liverpool
Street and Kentish Town was unbridgeable. It seemed quite possible
that I would never get home. I was flooded with the
certainty that this was the beginning of the rest of my life of
homelessness. I suppose (even with a sore foot *) I could have
walked home in an hour or so. But as well as the sense that homeless
for the rest of my life didn’t depend on the logic of effort
but
on some cosmic decision that had been pending and was now
made, I had not the faintest idea in which direction to head.
Liverpool Street is nowhere to me. It might have been a windblasted
beach in Antarctica for all my sense of direction† was
capable of detecting. I started to walk, but with every step wondered
if I should turn around and go the other way. How is one
to know which way to go if you don’t know? That was when I
began to cry – just a stifled sob or two. I have felt bereft
on an
Antarctic beach, but it was muted by the fact that I was there
because I wanted to be there, and I knew that a dinghy was
scheduled to take me back to the ship in three hours. I have
never wanted to be at Liverpool Street Station. Yet I grew up
roaming London: wandered around Soho and Charing Cross
Road, took the bus alone from Tottenham Court Road to
Camden Town every day to go to primary school, to Stepney
when I started secondary school, ran away to Wembley when I
was twelve, secretly met my father in Golders Green bus station.
I was by both necessity and inclination an independent and
resourceful child. But in my late forties I had to fight back tears
because I was stranded at Liverpool Street – because I felt
lost
and alone in the world. After half an hour or so, a taxi
approached with its light on. I felt at home in the taxi.
*Of which see later
†Of which see later
Homesickness has retained a powerful if ill-defined grip on
me, but it seems to be at its most potent nearer to where ever
home is conceived to be, rather than a world away. Distance is a
difficult calculation. If it is defined by the time it takes to get
from one place to another, then there’s no difference going
to
London from Cambridge railway station, or Amsterdam by plane
from Cambridge airport. Different speeds, of course, but the
speed of the vehicle travelled on is irrelevant to the traveller’s
understanding of how far they have gone. Time is the thing. Not
long ago it took me twelve hours to get from Inverness to
London, in theory by plane. The airport was fogged over, so we
were bussed to Aberdeen and then waited several hours for a
plane, which left us at the wrong London airport thus taking
much longer to get to King’s Cross, from which the late train
to
Cambridge stopped at each station taking an age to get there. It
would have been twice as quick to have caught a train home from
Inverness. In the time it took me to get back from the north of
Scotland, I could have returned to Cambridge from somewhere
beyond Singapore. That journey was just modernity playing its
regular cruel trick, but I had the same sense of panic as I had
trying to get to Camden from Liverpool Street. I was too near
where I was going to tolerate the difficulty. The only safe distance
from home is the far distant.
Perhaps – after an initial refusal – I said
yes to the New Zealand
invitation because it was as far distant as it was possible to be.
I
was invited to the Wellington Readers and Writers Festival for
eight days in the early spring, which was their autumn. I asked for
the return flight date to be extended so that I could spend a couple
of weeks travelling around on my own. Far, far away. In transit.
A
stranger, unwatched by anyone, no one’s concern, wandering
around or staying still at will, once I had finished my stint as
a
public writer. Wandering, not trying to get home. I daydreamed of
driving a rented car through the most exotic of landscapes, and of
being alone in forests and by the sea. I had a hankering for being
completely on my own after the closeness of life with the Poet in
Cambridge. I had a nagging worry that closeness was wrong for
me. I missed being a stranger. I thought that strangerhood was
where I really lived, and needed to get to it for a while. Quiet,
no
one else except for other strangers. The very warmth and pleasure
of my relationship with the Poet seemed to me to deafen me. I
wanted, I thought to myself, to think – meaning not be connected
to anyone – so that I could hear the echoes inside my head.
I felt
I was avoiding something I ought to be listening to. I wanted to
be
alone as far from home as I could get: not that near-enough-to home
that causes homesickness, the unbearable unheimlich. I
wanted unheimlich – it is essentially what I am always looking
for –
but of the right kind. Strangeness and strangerness without the
blank despair. A matter, I decided, of no one nearby to care what
I did, and the far, far distance. New Zealand fitted the bill almost
perfectly: I have never particularly wanted to go to New Zealand,
I knew no one in the country, and you couldn’t get further
away
from almost anywhere.
After twenty-eight hours in transit, I got off the plane
at Christchurch, New Zealand, to be informed by vast signs and
paintings on the walls in the airport that I had arrived at Middle
Earth. The journey had begun on the morning of 4 March in
Drummer Street, Cambridge, when I got on the ten o’clock bus
to New Zealand. To Heathrow, actually, but it felt as if this first
step was the crucial one, and it entertained me that a journey of
twelve thousand miles should begin on bus number JL717. (Of
course, if the plane had crashed, it might have seemed to my surviving
friends that the journey had begun in 1947 in the
Tottenham Court Road, or back in 1912 and 1910 when my parents
were born in the East End of London, or during the war
when they met and she got pregnant while her then husband was
overseas.) A young woman with her backpack beside her sat
opposite me in the seat across the aisle. She held an old white rectangle
of towelling, a nappy or a hand towel faded to grey with
washing, and throughout the journey she lightly brushed its
frayed edges back and forth across her lips, rhythmically, over and
over, as she must have been doing for twenty or more years. The
action rendered her completely private. Of course, I could see her
doing it, but in some fashion, the hypnotic comfort of the remnant
of cloth on her lips made me, and everything else, invisible
to her – which, perhaps, is as private as a person can get.
We took off from Heathrow at dusk and flew into a night that
lasted two days by the calendar or twenty-three hours by an unaltered
watch. At some point along the flight path between London
and Singapore, the world turned or I overflew its spin or whatever
it is that happens, and a day disappeared. After a three-hour
stopover, long enough for a shower, and another flight, I landed
in Christchurch on the morning of 6 March. I don’t sleep on
planes. I tried for the oblivion of the girl on the bus, but lacked
a
towel or some other soothing fetish to take my mind off the
world. I felt only that awful restlessness of waiting for a long
time
to pass. I fidgeted, ate the stream of meals that came to me, drank
water, and fidgeted some more. I watched Kill Bill 1 on the screen
on the back of the seat in front of me, and tried not to watch Love
Actually, which was on every screen in my peripheral vision
throughout the journey. I listened to John Dowland’s pavannes,
to
Rossini’s Petite Messe Solonelle, to Tom Waits’ ‘Alice’.
All of
them, in retrospect, connected by a kind of mock or mocking
melancholia. I read a book about reading. I took Temazapam and
stayed wide awake. I got very close to watching Love Actually, but
at the last moment began to watch Jack Nicholson and that Annie
Hall woman in a film that tried to re-make Love Actually without
its audience noticing. I switched it off and decided to watch the
sublime Kill Bill 1 again. I think I may have let a weary tear fall
once or twice, sentimentalising over my book of lost stories and
library closures. By the time we touched down I was barely sane,
and certainly not sensible.
And when the signs insisted I had got to Middle Earth, I was
groggy enough not to care where I was. New Zealand, Middle
Earth, Tottenham Court Road, any place, so long as I was somewhere
(although actually I still wasn’t; only in transit to
Wellington on the North Island. Another wait, another delay,
another plane journey, another landing in another airport). So,
being sick with lack of sleep, lagging a day ahead of myself, and
overhearing one young man explaining earnestly to another, ‘I
was reading this Tibetan monk who said that we only use one
per cent of our brains. Wow, huh?’, Middle Earth seemed as
likely a place to be as anywhere. Although it meant that time as
well as space travel had to be involved because, for a few
moments in my muddled brain, Middle Earth was the place I’d
known in 1969, an underground club, literally and metaphorically,
somewhere in a Notting Hill basement I think, where we
ingested quantities of hallucinogens while dancing, or sitting
cross-legged to watch the recombinatory adventures of hot
coloured oils projected on to screens all around the dark, smoke
and incense-thick room, and listened to the pixilated lutes, tambours
and whining voices of The Incredible String Band:
And I’ve nothing to do,
And I’ve nowhere to go;
I’m not in the slightest way upset.
. . . And I’m not even chasing the sunset . . .
For a demented moment in Christchurch airport I wondered
how anyone could possibly fault those tripping troubadours and
their incredible string message. What other condition was there
to aim for in my frazzled state, or in any state at all? No wonder
I took the hippie route in the Sixties. It was my route home. I was
a lizard and someone sweetly turned over a rock in front of me.
Oh, God, yes, that’s where I belong. And I’m not even
chasing the
sunset . . . Then I remembered all that was decades long gone, that
I was in New Zealand and that the walls were simply reminding
jet-lag bedevilled travellers about the dreary sourcebook of my
drug-crazed somnambulistic hippie nights, The Bloody Lord of
the Bloody Rings, which had been filmed there and recently won
a regiment of Oscars. There are only about four million people in
the country and it seemed as I travelled that almost everyone had
either been in the movie (there were calls for extras apparently
that required only those over six-foot seven-inches or under four
foot to apply) or been inconvenienced by it, so it was a cause of
great national pride. It’s not for me to judge. As I say, I
didn’t, at
that point, care where I was, though perhaps I would have preferred
to be on the moon – the Sea of Tranquillity, say, which
seemed just as probable as New Zealand – but I was still in
that
state of passive acceptance of life or death or finding oneself in
surprising places, which is the only way to survive the stupefying
effects of long-haul jet travel.
After I’d spent just a little time in the country,
it seemed less
surprising that the people of New Zealand should have embraced
rather than resented their reassignment to Middle Earth, because
there can’t be a population in the world who so consciously
feel
themselves to be peripheral. My guess is that they would welcome
being in Middle Anywhere. Everyone explained, almost by
way of saying hello, how far away they are. ‘We’re so far away,’ they kept telling me apologetically. ‘Far away from what?’ I’d
ask, surprised, because they and I
were both here, so far as it was ever possible to tell.
‘Everything.’
In fact, of course, everything is far away from New
Zealand when that is where you are. But perhaps that’s easy
to say if you
are merely making a visit and you have a return ticket to the far
away you came from. It doesn’t help, I should think, that so
many
of the place names on the map are not Maori, but hankerings
after some home that was home, if ever, generations ago:
Christchurch, Wellington, Cheviot, Hastings, Richmond,
Eltham, Oxford, Cambridge, Blenheim, Hamilton, Dunedin.
Eltham, for God’s sake.
As soon as they’ve met you and ascertained that
you are from those parts, most New Zealanders tell you about their
European
trip; their year or five spent where far away isn’t, as if
on dayrelease
from the penal colony. Or they say, with an unnecessary
degree of passion and determination, that they are planning such
a trip soon – or one day. Shop assistants and students, academics
and artists, all earnestly assure you they have been or will go,
like
people conscious that they are illiterate in a world full of bookworms
and promising to remedy it. I’d thought that the traffic
was, these days, the other way, with backpackers and gap-yearers
heading off for a trip of a lifetime to New Zealand. But either
because the distance really is palpable, or because the New
Zealanders’ sense of wonder at where they already are in the
world is so omnipresent and insistent, the feeling of separation
grabbed me too, and I begin to think like a local. I’ve never
felt
the distance of distance so strongly. Not on that beach in the
Antarctic, not sitting with my legs dangling over the edge of the
jetty, gazing towards the end of the world through Drake’s
Passage at the tip of Tierra del Fuego, not even in the desolate,
dusty nowhere of the station platform in Raton, New Mexico,
staring off into the hazy featureless horizon looking for the pinpoint
that would be my train out of there. But this was not a
remoteness like being in the grip of a depression or outside
Liverpool Street Station without a taxi. Not unheimlich in the
sense of needing to get home and being barred from doing so. It
was the ‘world’, whatever I and my New Zealand hosts
meant by
that, which was so remote. Not homesickness, but world-lostness.
Not, so far as I was concerned, an unpleasant feeling at all.
During the first week, the ‘international writers’ at
the book festival
were a group. There were thirteen or so of us internationals
all together in the Hotel de Wheels (which adopted its soubriquet
when, a few years ago, after it was decided to put the Te Papa
Maori museum in its place, it was hoisted up on to a hotel-sized
trolley and wheeled from the harbour front across the road to the
opposite pavement). Us thirteen international writers were locked
together and on show because we were from far away. A group –
bussed here and there, waiting side by side in the lobby for our
various interviewers and photographers – because we all didn’t
come from there. We were from Israel, Germany, America,
Australia, Canada, Singapore, UK. An arbitrary group (though
pretty white and largely Anglophone) except that we all wrote –
fiction, non-fiction or poetry – which gave us less in common
than non-writers might imagine.
Our large bright rooms, with heavenly bathrooms and
showers big enough for dancing in, opened out on to a continuous
balcony
where, together or separately, we could sit and watch the comings
and goings on the harbour front, a place, like all harbour fronts
these days, of play and sport rather than work and sea traffic. On
the first afternoon we were driven in convoy to the Governor’s
residence to be welcomed in her immaculate gardens. Speeches in
English and a bit of Maori. Shaking of hands, smiling smiles, as
polite and grateful as we could manage; a very well-behaved collection
of international writers. I miss the days I never knew of
loud-mouthed, liquored, sexually rampant writers. How tame we
were. Positively ambassadorial. How fearful that if we didn’t
behave – what? We’ll never be published again? Never
asked
back? Sent to bed without our tea? During the week, morning and
afternoon, we went off to the cinema (refurbished for the premier
of The Lord of the Rings, and now in use for less glitzy delights)
where the Festival readings and panels were held. A phalanx, a
super-group of International Writers, some of us on stage, the
rest in the two rows of seats reserved for us, opened the proceedings.
Naturally, we formed our own subgroups or solitudes fast,
according to our preconceptions of each other, how we supposed
they thought about us, mutual regard or contempt for the work,
and plain antipathy or attraction.
We collided in corridors, went off for lunch and gossiped
about the others, and we met in the foyer in the queue (most often
at three or four in the morning for those of us with European jetlag)
for the single computer with internet access. We waited
edgily for our turn to get back in touch with the world and raised
our eyebrows in recognition of our own absurdity to others who
waited, while the person at the treasured machine made the most
of their online time. Each one of us, once we had gained access to
the computer, ignored the length of the waiting queue and huddled
over the keyboard as if it were a security towel, tapping away
at unheard-of speeds. One thing writers can do is type fast and
look intense while they’re doing it. I watched the hunched
backs
impatiently and with increasing despair, convinced (as, of course,
it turned out was everyone else) that whoever was hogging the
machine was keying in and sending the finest prose or most incisive
poetry back to excited editors in their own countries, while I
was just waiting to email frantic, barely literate messages home
to
the Poet complaining about being jet-lagged and overwrought.
There were parties and more parties, cocktails, dinner, lunches
and launches, opening parties and closing parties. There were
moments of escape, when I sat on the balcony and stared at the
ever-present wind whistling round Wellington’s corners and
blowing old ladies against lamp posts. And there were the public
performances where, separately and in various combinations, we
took to the stage to read from our books and take questions from
a reading public who here, as everywhere, wanted to know how
we disciplined ourselves to work and where we got our ideas
from. To which questions neither I nor anyone else seems to have
a satisfactory answer (though my standard answers 1] by receiving
gas bills and 2] desperation, seem as likely as any).
There were Maori greeting ceremonies almost daily. I have
never been so greeted in my life. The first of these was a surprise,
the second felt more like an assault, the third and later
ones I skipped. The Maoris and the descendants of European
settlers seem to have come to a very uneasy accommodation
about who the place belongs to. Great battles were raging, while
we were there, about who owned the offshore fishing rights. The
left was accusing the right of racism. The right was accusing
the left of racism. The Maoris were demanding their land under
the sea. The white New Zealanders were muttering about being
discriminated against. The minority status of the original inhabitants
was on everyone’s minds, as conscience or victimhood,
which resulted in extreme public displays of togetherness. All
formal verbal greetings are said both in English and Maori by
everyone, and both languages are taught compulsorily in schools.
One of the organisers received a complaint that the International
Writers were racist because none of us had learned any Maori in
order to greet their audience bilingually. Heritage looms large in
place of real cross-cultural ease. The Maori greeting ceremony
was a version of what you see the All Blacks doing before a
rugby match, but much more up close and personal. Its original
intention was to warn off any visitor thinking of taking a liberty,
with a show of the extreme warlike nature of their hosts. A
twenty-minute choreographed assault by young men in loincloths
making testosteronic gestures, offering violence against
you (spears pointed, repeated fuck-off gestures with one arm
inside the crook of the jerking other arm, eye-rolling, tongue
lolling, bellowing, leaping within inches of you). Behind them,
women do much the same thing, though you sense that their
presence has more to do with equal rights within the ethnic
group than authentic Maori warrior behaviour. And we white
international authors, properly liberal, stood in our best or least
creased party clothes, smiling gratefully at the assault. It became
hard to say which party was most assaulted. Some of the young
men drew blood as they beat themselves in their frenzied
attempt to show us visitors who was boss. On the whole, it
seemed to me that a handshake and a watchful eye is a wiser
method of ensuring peace between strangers. Frankly, the
amount of time and energy used up by the warriors displaying
their terribleness would have allowed any real enemy to load
their rifles in their own good time, take leisurely aim and fire.
I
had an image of a bloodbath, and astonished, dying young men
gasping with their last breath, ‘But we hadn’t finished
scaring
you. Not fair.’ Heritage, of course, but if a group of young
men
behaved like that to me anywhere else in the world, I’d have
been
inclined to tell them to fuck off and stamp on their bare feet. Or
run a mile. But heritage, so we all responded (even the American
author whose idea of fun was shooting holes in the books of
those who criticised his) with the sensitive dead smiles of foreign
dignitaries being entertained by the locals, as patronising as any
imperial working party visiting the colonies.
After a week, the formalities were over, the readings
were done, emails exchanged, and the international writers dispersed
back
to the wide world from which they had come. Now it was my
time. I was simply far away, as far away as it was possible to get,
on my own and purposeless. Almost free as a bird. A return
date, a stop off in Auckland to see some people about a film
they wanted to make of one of my novels, aside from that,
nothing. I sat in the lobby of the hotel with a map, waving
farewell from time to time to International Writers, and made a
plan. To Auckland by plane. From Auckland to . . . I spotted a
peninsula on the east labelled the Coromandel Coast. Dum di
dum di dum di dumdum started to play in my head. Dum di dum
di dum di dumdum . . . On the coast of Coromandel . . . Edward
Lear . . . The Yonghy-Bonghy-Bo. The heart-wrenching story of
a tragic love between the Yonghy-Bonghy-Bo and the Lady
Jingly Jones.
On the Coast of Coromandel
Where the early pumpkins blow,
In the middle of the woods
Lived the Yonghy-Bonghy-Bo.
Two old chairs, and half a candle,
One old jug without a handle,—
These were all his worldly goods:
In the middle of the woods,
These were all the worldly goods
Of the Yonghy-Bonghy-Bo,
Of the Yonghy-Bonghy-Bo.
‘Lady Jingly! Lady Jingly!
Sitting where the pumpkins blow,
Will you come and be my wife?’
Said the Yonghy-Bonghy-Bo,
‘I am tired of living singly,—
On this coast so wild and shingly,—
I’m a-weary of my life;
If you’ll come and be my wife,
Quite serene would be my life!’
Said the Yonghy-Bonghy-Bo,
Said the Yonghy-Bonghy-Bo.
‘On this Coast of Coromandel
Shrimps and watercresses grow,
Prawns are plentiful and cheap,’
Said the Yonghy-Bonghy-Bo.
‘You shall have my chairs and candle,
And my jug without a handle!
Gaze upon the rolling deep
(Fish is plentiful and cheap):
As the sea, my love is deep!’
Said the Yonghy-Bonghy-Bo,
Said the Yonghy-Bonghy-Bo.
But it was not to be. The Lady Jingly was married already to
Mr Jones (Handel Jones, Esquire and Co) in England, who sends
her Dorking Hens from time to time as a sign of his continued
existence. She’s sorry, she really is:
‘Though you’ve such a tiny body,
And your head so large doth grow,—
Though your hat may blow away,
Mr Yonghy-Bonghy-Bo!
Though you’re such a Hoddy Doddy,
Yet I wish that I could modi-
-fy the words I needs must say!
Will you please to go away?
That is all I have to say,
Mr. Yonghy-Bonghy-Bo!
Mr. Yonghy-Bonghy-Bo!’
Her desolated lover disappears off to beyond the sea on the
back of a passing turtle and leaves the Lady Jingly Jones alone to
wonder how, but for the fact of Handel Jones Esquire, things
might have been so very different:
From the Coast of Coromandel
Did that Lady never go,
On that heap of stones she mourns
For the Yonghy-Bonghy-Bo.
On that Coast of Coromandel,
In his jug without a handle
Still she weeps, and daily moans;
On that little heap of stones
To her Dorking Hens she moans,
For the Yonghy-Bonghy-Bo,
For the Yonghy-Bonghy-Bo.
And there was the coast of Coromandel on the eastern edge of
North Island, just a bus drive away from Auckland (as well, of
course, as on the south-eastern coast of India), just waiting for
me to spend some solitary time in it.
I found something called a Farmstay in the guide book. It
said:
As soon as your car heads down the long, fern flanked driveway
you will know you are in another world. Settle in, then take a
wander in the cool bush, paddle a kayak on a tranquil harbour or
just walk and talk with the animals.
Or just sit and softly weep into a jug without a handle. I called
and booked into one of the farmstay cottages – view of the
hills
and harbour, no other guests staying – for several days. There
are
geysers and volcanoes, rainforests and mountains – no end of
places a person ought to see in New Zealand, and most visitors,
knowing their chances of returning are fairly slim, see everything
they can possibly fit in. But, although I only had about a week
and a half after I finished talking to the animals on the
Coromandel Peninsula, I had focussed now on the glorious
sound of Doubtful Sound and I planned the rest of my time
around my desire to get there. In a great flurry of deciding and
telephoning, I booked everything from the sofa in the hotel
lobby: overnight bed and breakfasts between destinations, the
hotel in Te Anau in Fiordland which is the nearest town to the
Sound, flights and buses, and the three-hour boat trip through
Doubtful Sound itself. I finished just as the taxi arrived to take
me to Wellington Airport for Auckland, and then the bus to the
coast of Coromandel.
|